CTE

Due to our unfortunate involvement in the Middle Eastern wars we have become familiar with CTE, or Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Soldiers exposed to heavy blasts and explosions often suffer serious concussions. They may survive the hit but the trauma may leave them with a damaged brain involving changes in some biochemical processes that will slowly but surely lead to deterioration of brain functions. As the adjective “chronic” suggests the condition is irreversible and, so far, incurable. The symptoms are devastating but may not appear until years after the incident.

Needless to say, our soldiers did not deliberately expose themselves to the danger of slowly losing their minds. They are heros whom we sent out to fight in defense of our national interests. Most of us, of course, stay home. There is a bumper sticker that says “We support our troops.” It is probably too lukewarm a tribute when you consider what could happen to our troops years later as a result of brain damage incurred in the line of duty.

There is another part to the CTE story. The victims in this story are also afflicted with CTE but they are not heros fighting for anybody’s country. They are merely athletes, mostly football players, strong, skillful, admired, and often well paid men. But while the soldier in the field is wounded in the service of his country many, if not most football players suffer equally serious concussions with the same symptoms and consequences while, and this sounds absurd to me, while playing with a ball! It is called a game, but it looks more like the fight-to-the-death gladiatorial games the ancient Romans were fond of.

To the fans, of course, football is not trivial at all. Football games are watched and cheered by thousands, sometimes millions. And so, although it is more like a business, it is also still a game and a spectators’ pastime which has taken on the aura of a national, even patriotic, ritual. There is a Greek word, eisegesis (as opposed to exegesis), used by textual scholars to characterise interpretations that introduce the interpreter’s own ideas beyond what the text says. Applied to the issue of football, we have on the one side, simply stated, a ball game, albeit a dangerous one. On the other side we have the fans who interpret the same set of circumstances as a patriotic ritual, something that merits flags and national anthems.

My prediction is that the game will go on, football forever, ignoring the threat of encephalopathy. We will manage to convince ourselves that it cannot by as serious as all that. We spectators do not risk anything. The players do. Just as we do not go to war, soldiers do. Football is a well established tradition and we will continue to rely on our own interpretations of what it means and what it is good for. We may be dealing with a third kind of CTE which I would call Continuing Traditional Eisegesis.

The sad part is that even school boys and college students are often encouraged to play this macho “sport” of football. Is it worth the risk? Or is it time for “Friday Night Lights Out” as someone suggested in a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times (2/8/18). My guess, though, is that this will go on, encephalopathy or no encephalopathy. Unless, perhaps, mothers of sons start a protest movement.

PS. Women are known to do such things.

(c)2018 by Herbert H. Hoffman
Picture credits: brain stock photo

Frost on the Wall

“Trump renews wall demand” [Headline in Los Angeles Times]

When I came to the United States as an immigrant in the early fifties people were very much into education. Empowered by the G.I. Bill, veterans crowded the colleges. “English”, which included American literature, was a required subject then, and every body knew who Robert Frost was. When I first read the line “I took the road less traveled by and that has made all the difference” I thought that it was so very American, so much like “I did it my way”. When he writes “Something there is that does not like a wall”, and when Cole Porter sings “Don’t fence me in”, are these not arch-American sentiments you could not express better any other way?

But that was six decades ago. The culture has changed. Who, after all, would read poetry on their iPads, really now? Perhaps our culture does not encourage us to use the right half of our brain, where we store wisdom, as opposed to the left where we keep our facts. Or perhaps our values have changed. Maybe we do love walls, after all? It pains me, the self-appointed defender of all that was good when I was young, to now have to admit that we may have to update our very poets. But can you imagine Robert Frost admitting that “Something there is that does love a wall”? And should we really join Cole Porter and sing “Do fence me in”? And while we are at it, should we improve Ronald Reagan’s powerful speech? What if he had said “Mister Gorbachev, do keep up that wall”?

We are new to this wall business. Other nations have walls. The Chinese love their wall as a tourist attraction. Hadrian, too, was very happy with his. Kept the British out of Londinium. He thought. Oh yes, and the Roman Limes, the 500 km wall that was supposed to keep the Germans out of Frankfurt. Those, of course, were bigger projects. But watch out, World! We have not even started yet. Ours will be much bigger.

What, however, if the prophet Carl Sandburg saw something we have not seen yet? In his Chicago poem “A Fence” he writes: “As a fence it was a masterpiece… (but) passing through the bars and over the steel points will go nothing except Death and the Rain and To-morrow.”

Meanwhile, though, while we are on the subject of reviewing our poets let us also look at what Shakespeare had to say on the subject. In his Midsummer-Night’s Dream the villagers are about to perform a play. One character, Quince the carpenter, is the self-appointed director. In discussing the necessary stage props he speaks these memorable words: “Then, there is another thing: we must have a wall”. He also specifies that there has to be a cranny in that wall “for Pyramus to whisper through” (and tell the people on the other side, perhaps, that they must pay and that we hope they do?)

Funny how Shakespeare always emerges as the most current of all poets if we tweek him a little.
(c)2018 by Herbert H. Hoffman Picture credit: easyfreeclipart.com

PS: For $25 an artist, Christoph Buechel, takes visitors to see the eight border wall prototypes. “They may have significant cultural value”, he jokes. (I think)