Two Cities

The first house we bought, my wife and I, was small. Two rooms and one bath. But we had not bought it for size. We had fallen for the garden. There were two orange trees, a Valencia and a Navel. There was a lath house full of fuchsias. We had a jasmine bush and several deciduous trees around a lawn. The small living room had a picture window looking out on this little paradise of ours.

Clearly, other people feel the same way about the beauty, even the necessity, of flowers, fruit, and greenery. Many a community prides itself of being the “Garden City” of the West or East or whatever. But as sure as variety can be said to be the spice of life there are also those, bless them, who go for the clean shave: some concrete to step on, a pool, and a few pots with geraniums and voilá, the perfect “garden”.

We occasionally chatted with our neighbors over the back fence. I remember the lady praising us for the beautiful garden we maintained. But her folks, she admitted, just were not garden people. “We are car people”, she once said, “from Detroit”. As she said that she motioned with her arms to indicate the three half-disassembled automobiles that were the only ornaments on her side of the fence. I have often thought of this episode, reflecting on the fact that people so much alike in many ways can yet be so different at the same time.

On a visit to Paris the first thing we saw in Parc Monceau, a lovely green spot in the 8th arrondissement, was a statue of the novelist Alfred de Musset. That same day my wife stumbled upon a statue of the dramatist Beaumarchais on rue St. Antoine near the Opera Bastille. On the Left Bank we found a bust of Chateaubriand, the first of the Romantics. Then we noticed that the offices of Air France were located on place Rostand, author of Cyrano de Bergerac, a play written in 1897 and last turned into a movie in 1950. North of the Marais was the blvd. Voltaire and near the Étoile, the rue Balzac. We found a rue Chenier and an allee Cendrars, not to forget a rue Hugo and a square Zola. It was quite obvious that in Paris poets, dramatists, and novelists are kept in high esteem. As we searched some more we found that all Parisian streets have names and that at least 175 of them are named for writers.

I do not know about Boston or New York, but on a map of Los Angeles I found only seven streets named for men of letters. As far as I was able to determine Willa Cather, James Fenimore Cooper, Emily Dickinson, William Faulkner, Robert Frost, Nathaniel Hawthorne, John Steinbeck, Ernest Hemingway, Edgar Allan Poe, J.D. Salinger, and Mark Twain, to count off a few prospects, did not make it. Maybe I am reading more into this than is reasonable but I have a suspicion that it says something about our two cities when I tell you that there are at least 650 streets in Los Angeles that have no names, just cold numbers.

(c) 2017 by Herbert H Hoffman
Picture credit: cityroom blogs ny times

Playing With Our Food

Food has always been a popular topic.  The Bible reports that even in the days of Solomon food was already something a king would pray for. “Feed me with food convenient for me”, as the translator of the English Bible of 1611 put it (Proverbs 30:8), anticipating the age of convenience foods by 3000 years.

We all, of course, want food that is convenient. We want good food (it tastes good), but it should also be healthy (good for us).

There are essentially three pathways to nutritional happiness. There is traditional food: a plain cookie, for example, or Kelloggs Raisin Bran.  But consumers are so skeptical nowadays that the manufacturers of the cereal thought it wise to add the phrase “With Pure Fruit” to the label, referring no doubt to the raisins and implying at the same time that other cereal makers use impure raisins. Or, god forbid, raisin flavor; or even more heinously, natural raisin flavor.

Then there is takeout food, i.e. food that has something taken out, like cookies baked without salt and/or sugar. Or milk for example. Milk leads in the take out category. You can have it with fat and all, or else without any of the fat or with some of it, by percentage points. Most other dairy products are also available without fat or with low fat content. The latter kind are sometimes called “lite” which means that even the orthography was taken out. The choices here are either taste or health. You cannot have both at the same time. I am prepared to do without the fat, but I draw the line when it comes to fat free half and half. I see this as a logical dilemma.

And then there is food that has something added, perhaps stewed tomatoes with added garlic, thyme, basil, oregano, basil and oregano, pineapple, or papaya, the variations are endless. I think the prize in this category goes to coffee. Some coffee may still taste like coffee, but beware the Mad Mixer. He is the playful gnome that lives behind the roasting pans, thinking up new flavors. If you don’t pay close attention to labels your coffee may taste of vanilla, cinnamon, mocha, buttery caramel, almond, banana, blueberry, chocolate, chocolate mint, coconut, hazelnut, or peanut butter, to name a few varieties.

We must not forget the extreme convenience foods. There is, for example, a certain kind of salad dressing. The 355 ml bottle, the label indicates, is free of calories, sugar, fat, carbohydrates, gluten, and cholesterol. There is nothing left in it, it seems. If you now just remove the lettuce as well you needn’t even wash the salad bowl. How convenient is that!

Or Maple Grove Farms’ “Low Calorie Syrup with Butter Flavor”, a substance that has nothing whatsoever to do with butter, or with maples for that matter. But it is sugar free. According to the label it consists of water, sorbitol, natural and artificial flavors, cellulose gum, salt, caramel color, sucralose, phosphoric acid, sodium benzoate, acesulfame potassium, aspartame, potassium sorbate, citric acid, phenylketonurics, and a little phenylalanine.

God may have made the Leviathan for the sport of it (KJV, Psalm 104), but surely he would not have played with Solomon’s syrup for the sport of it.  Even the Old Testament God who could be pretty inscrutable on occasion would not have sent him butter-flavored artificial manna with sugar free syrup for the “hellth” of it, would he?

No, God knows better but Mr. Wilton is less concerned with the details of what you eat: Wilton’s chocolate sprinkles, for example, contain sugar, cornstarch, cottonseed oil, cocoa processed with alkali, soy lecithin, dextrin, glaze, natural flavor, artificial flavor, and carnauba wax, a substance that is also used on cars and floors in addition to chocolate sprinkles. But don’t let me stop you. They are delicious on vanilla ice cream.

Which in turn may contain guar gum, locust bean gum, carrageenan, xanthan gum, polysorbate 80, mono- and diglycerides, and possibly artificial vanilla flavor and gelatin. If we are what we eat I am surprised we have not all turned purple yet, or something.

© 2017 by Herbert H. Hoffman

Picture credit medicalnewstoday.com

On Drinking Tea

Tea is a plant and all plants, thanks to the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné, have binomial Latin names. So we are talking about Thea sinensis. But not really. We usually talk only about the leaves. How they are plucked, fermented, and dried. Not even that, actually. We are mostly interested in the drink that results from pouring hot water over those dry leaves. In short, we drink a cup of tea.

Some people drink tea for breakfast. In a Chinese restaurant you might get tea for lunch or dinner. In Great Britain, on cruise ships, and all the finer hotels in the world you have afternoon tea which includes not only tea, the drink, but also cucumber sandwiches. A certain class of people call that high tea. It is usually brought by somebody called James. High tea comes close to being a ceremony or ritual, in addition to being a meal.

Another way of high tea is celebrated in Japan. In the Japanese order of things the preparation and consumption of tea is vaguely connected to Buddhism and yes, the tea may be thin or thick, powdered or leaf, and for all I know, even bag. But to do it right, i.e. with respect, grace, and proper form you may have to go to Tea School and learn from a master and that could take years, no kidding.

Another group of ritual tea drinkers is found in Brasil and Argentina. The “tea” in those parts is called Mate. It is brewed in a gourd which is passed from person to person. One drinks it through a communal silver straw which is also passed around for all to use. Think before you book a vacation in South America. Are you prepared for this? It is considered an insult if you decline the invitation to participate, I think.

You drink English tea out of a cup with a handle, preferably Spode china. Japanese tea is sipped out of ceramic cups without handles. In Mongolia tea is more like a hearty soup, slurped out of bowls. Mongolian tea is very strong. It is churned with a little salt and a generous blob of butter made from the milk of yaks. In the days before refrigeration the butter was often rancid. That was considered normal, however, and then as now a Mongolian man’s proper breakfast is a bowl of butter tea. I understand that these days cheaper teabags and cows’ milk are acceptable. There goes the age of ceremonial living. O tempora, o mores.

And then there is Russian tea. One drinks it out of a glass. Without sugar. Between swallows one takes a spoonful of varenye, or jam. At least according to my father who was born there.

In Germany, my native country, and also in China I understand, people are intrigued by the variety of dried plant leaves other than Thea sinensis that can be made into a drink. Thus the word “tea” became a generic term for any such infusion. As a child I especially liked peppermint tea. Recently I heard that peppermint is bad for the eyes. Maybe that is why I have had to wear glasses since I was ten and why my Latin is so bad because I could not read what Herr Kache wrote on the black board. And why I still hate Herr Kache because he made fun of my Latin in front of the class. And all this because of Mentha piperita. The stuff is dangerous!

Nowadays, ending most of my days as a nervous wreck, I drink a cup of “Relaxing Tea” at bed time. It makes me go to sleep because it contains valerian, passion flower, skullcap, chamomile, and catnip. According to the U.S. Pharmacopoeia, I believe, it should actually kill me. But then the War did not kill me, either. I am lucky, I suppose.

If you are queasy you may not want to read on because we are crossing a line, from tea as an infusion of dried plant matter to tea as an infusion — well let us just say a liquid produced by pouring hot water over the antlers of a dead deer. Antler tea, in other words. I understand that the CDC has issued a warning that this tea may really kill you. It can give you botulism.

Enough of tea suitable for human consumption. But there is more. I have heard of garlic tea. It is supposed to smell so bad that aphids and tomato worms run away and have dinner elsewhere. There is also a liquid we could call “compost” tea. It is made from decomposed plant matter and manure. Let me emphasize that it is delicious and nutritional for anything you plant in your garden. For the rest of us caution is advised: toddlers and dogs also love that sort of stuff.

(c) 2017 by Herbert H. Hoffman
Picture credit: pexels.com

By the Elephant’s Early Light

What happened a hundred years ago may be considered old by many of us. What happened in 1492 was already considered history by our Founding Fathers in 1800. “Old” is a relative term, it depends on your viewpoint. On the scale of history, however, the entire 500 year span of European discovery and settlement is brand new. If you want old in America you have to look to what we call the Native Americans. Depending on where you went to school you learned either nothing about their origins, when and from where they came, or perhaps you heard of the Alaskan land bridge and tribes from Asia that arrived about 15 thousand years ago on the American continent. If I look at it from this angle I have to admit that all of us who came here after 1492 are newcomers.

It made me feel better when I read a report in the newspaper about humanids (pre-homo sapiens, apparently) that lived in San Diego (or what passed for San Diego then) some 130 thousand years ago. Now that would make even the above mentioned Native Americans newcomers. We may all be fellow newcomers in the end.

Those early people, unfortunately, are now extinct. On the basis of fossils that were excavated, archaeologists speculate that they hunted mastodons, forerunners of the elephants. Those early Americans were sloppy eaters judging by the leftover mastodon bone fragments that were found lying around, together with stone tools used to crack open femurs to suck out the fatty marrow. That they did that is not at all hard to believe because I have seen my own grandfather use his knife to poke around the bones in my mother’s stew for the marrow, a messy affair. And I am sure he was not related to any of those folks in San Diego.

The mastodons are also extinct, by the way. Their descendants are the elephants. Good thing other foodstuffs were invented since then, because if I had to eat a lot of mastodon bone marrow or even grilled elephant trunk, for that matter, I would probably be extinct too before the year is out.

(c)2017 by Herbert H. Hoffman
Picture credit: Ancient Origins